| GEOM0001-1 | |||||
| Géométrie | |||||
|
Volume horaire :
|
|||||
|
Number of credits :
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Lecturer :
|
|||||
| Emmanuel DEMUELENAERE, Caroline DUBOIS | |||||
|
Référent UE :
|
|||||
| Caroline DUBOIS | |||||
|
Language(s) of instruction :
|
|||||
| French language | |||||
|
Organisation and examination :
|
|||||
| Teaching in the second semester | |||||
|
Units courses prerequisite and corequisite :
|
|||||
| Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program | |||||
|
Learning unit contents :
|
|||||
| The topics covered in this learning activity (LO) explore various aspects of geometry through a series of themed modules. The aim is to raise students' awareness of the presence and usefulness of geometric concepts in visual creation, while familiarizing them with practical implementation. Each module follows the same pedagogical structure, including a theoretical component, preparatory work, supervised practical sessions, and the submission of an individual or group assignment. The five modules covered are:
|
|||||
|
Learning outcomes of the learning unit :
|
|||||
Communicate and inform:
|
|||||
|
Prerequisite knowledge and skills :
|
|||||
| / | |||||
|
Planned learning activities and teaching methods :
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Mode of delivery (face to face, distance learning, hybrid learning) :
|
|||||
| In-person or hybrid teaching. | |||||
|
Recommended or required readings :
|
|||||
| Course materials: Available on the institutional course platform | |||||
|
Assessment methods and criteria :
|
|||||
| Mode of assessment: In-person Assessment format: Assignment submission Type of assessment: Continuous assessment Grading method: 100% of the final grade Assessment for resits: Any work not validated in the first session must be resubmitted for the second session In the event of suspected academic misconduct or the use of artificial intelligence tools not authorised under the assessment guidelines, the teaching team may require the student to attend an interview to verify that the submitted work genuinely reflects their own knowledge and skills. This interview may, for example, involve questions about the approach taken, an oral defence to assess the student's understanding of the subject, an additional practical exercise, or the completion of part of the work again. If the interview does not establish that the student has sufficient understanding and mastery of the submitted work, the provisions of the academic regulations relating to fraud or plagiarism may apply. |
|||||
|
Work placement(s) :
|
|||||
| / | |||||
|
Organizational remarks :
|
|||||
| Location: Namur Program schedule: Daytime classes LO schedule: see hyperplanning : https://heaj-planning.hyperplanning.fr/hp/etudiant |
|||||
|
Contacts :
|
|||||
| coordination.tib1@heaj.be | |||||